Sass 3100 vs Coriolis

Comparison between air samplers can only be done by aerosol experts under specific aerosol controlled conditions, to avoid any partial judgment coming from airsamplers manufacturers. Thanks to data published by independant scientists not financed by airsamplers manufacturers, released in scientific journals and reports, this is now made possible between Sass 3100 and Coriolis µ, airsamplers.

Sass 3100 best in collecting endotoxins

…. the Coriolis μ.underestimated the levels of detectable endotoxins …. elution of the SASS® 3100 filters with PBS
allowed efficient recovery of endotoxins…. We found that PBS elution
allowed the recovery of 98.0 ± 5.3% of endotoxins inoculated on filters…

Face-to-face comparison of the BioSampler and the SASS® 3100 in contaminated  environments revealed that the SASS® 3100 yielded superior recovery of  endotoxins per sampled air volume using PBS….

source: Activation des cellules dendritiques par des composantes de bioaérosols . 2019. Auteur:  Magali Boucher Maîtrise en microbiologieimmunologie avec mémoire  Maître ès sciences (M. Sc.) Centre de recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec au Canada

Sass 3100 best air sampler compared to Coriolis µ for biodiversity collection in aerosols.

…samples collected by the electrostatic dry sampler SASS 3100 showed a greater estimation and diversity of species richness than ….Coriolis. The lowest values were obtained by the Coriolis sampler….,

It is clear that the SASS 3100 produces indices of diversity-α far superior to those of Coriolis μ. … the SASS 3100 should be the recommended sampler for air biodiversity studies since it produces samples with a greater taxonomic richness.

source:  Applied & Environmental Microbiology. 2018 Dec 1 Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity Hamza Mbareche, et al,

source: An exploratory assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals and biological agents in biomethanation plants for putrescible organic matter -Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST)

Sass 3100 best rank amid 10 air samplers tested at Edgewood Chemical Biological Center

Test Report, Technology Evaluation Readiness Evaluation 08-2, CBR Technology Evaluation Branch, Edgewood CB Center, U.S. Army RDECOM, December, 2008.